“You must create a female for me, with whom I can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being.”
Sound familiar?
Such elevated dialogue is from Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel Frankenstein, spoken by the Monster to his creator, Victor Frankenstein.
In today’s eyes-glued-to-the-cellphone world, that request could be texted or posted on X as, “I’m lonely; I want a mate!”
Whatever the mode of communication, the yearning for companionship is part of our “human” DNA. Even God Almighty noted that “It is not good that the man shall be alone” (Genesis 2:18).
From that primal request in Mary Shelley’s original novel to modern cinematic reinterpretations, the figure of the Bride of Frankenstein has evolved from a constructed companion into a symbol of female autonomy and agency.
Origins: Shelley’s Vision
One can empathize with the Monster (put yourself in his size twenty shoes). Hardly a looker. In Volume I, Chapter IV, the novel notes that “no mortal could support the horror of that countenance.” In the Georgian era, your dating options were limited. No swipe-right apps for the Ugly and Deformed. No mail-order brides from Vietnam, Russia, or wherever they come from.
But there was the possibility of a made-to-order companion.
On the remote Orkney Islands in Scotland, Victor Frankenstein does commence the task but has a change of heart. "I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged."
He then put the mangled body parts into a basket weighted with stones, rowed out on the sea, and dumped it. “I listened to the gurgling sound as it sank, and then sailed away from the spot."
Order cancelled; request denied. The Monster’s female was now fish food.
Obviously, Mary Shelley did not write a sequel to Frankenstein. I do not know if she ever documented any desire to regalvanize this character. She certainly was a prolific writer throughout her life in a variety of genres. Included in her canon are the novels Valperga, The Last Man, and Lodore. She also wrote short stories, travel narratives, poems, and articles, and journaled extensively about her life.
However, the idea of a sequel, specifically about a female, was not lost at sea. That creative endeavour was picked up after Ms. Shelley’s death. The potential narrative of her life was a creative void that needed to be filled. And you know what our Latin-versed mates say (including my KBHS Latin teacher, Mr. Staniland): “Natura abhorret vacuum.”
Reanimation Through Culture
Remnants of the fish food have washed ashore on the creative mindscape of some very talented people. Firstly, a huge tip of the Jacaru sea cap should first be credited to James Whale. He directed the 1935 Universal Pictures Bride of Frankenstein. Mary Shelley’s female was now upgraded to a bride, specifically built for the monster[.
The movie also introduced the meta-narrative of having the same actress, Elsa Lanchester, play both Mary Shelley (in the prologue) and the monster’s mate at the end! And, of course, forever hair-sprayed into our collective consciousness is the bride’s Nefertiti Hair with the white lightning-bolt patterns on the sides.
Despite being the titular character, the bride’s screen time was only five minutes toward the end of the film. Still, as the Hollywood expression goes, “There are no small parts, only small actors.” And Ms. Lanchester gave a towering performance (I’m guessing seven feet tall). In her brief performance she hisses, screams, and, with drop-dead body language, rejects the monster.
In a poignant response, the monster replies: “We belong dead.”
Yeah, nah: In a story meme that deals with reanimation, there is no end to how many artistic ways the bride of Frankenstein and the monster can be regalvanized; there’s still flesh on those narrative bones. And over the past ninety-plus years, there has been a smorgasbord of options for whatever your bridal appetite.
Some other notable cinematic brides of Frankenstein: Jane Seymour (Frankenstein: The True Story, 1973); Jennifer Beals (The Bride, 1985); Madeline Kahn (Young Frankenstein, 1974); Fran Drescher (The Hotel Transylvania Franchise, 2012–2022); Phyllis Diller (Mad Monster Party, 1967).
Across other creative genres, the Bride has appeared in numerous reinterpretations—from theatre to modern animated franchises, theme parks, fashions shows—each reshaping her identity to reflect cultural attitudes toward women and autonomy.
And who hasn’t channeled their own inner monster…
The Modern Bride: Agency and Identity
While these earlier portrayals shaped the Bride as an object of creation, Maggie Gyllenhaal’s 2026 film The Bride! challenges that narrative entirely.
The meta-mantle is again picked up as author Mary Shelley breaks the fourth wall and rhetorically asks at the beginning of the film if the story to follow is to be a ghost story, a horror story, or a love story.
Categorically all three, but most saliently: The bride’s story! Exclamation point!
The dictionary tells us that a bride “is a woman about to be married.” The title of Gyllenhaal’s film insinuates “to whom” is a matter of the bride’s choice. Her marriage, should it happen, will be one of choice, not construct.
The film opens in 1930s Chicago. True to his identity, Frankenstein’s monster, who calls himself “Frank,” contacts rogue scientist Dr. Cornelia Euphronious with his unceasing request: He wants a companion. Dr. Euphronious perfunctorily refuses. But this is not Frank’s first reanimation rodeo. He knows that people with this creative ability also have egos.
“I thought you were a mad scientist?”
A flash of hubris animates the doctor’s eyes.
CUT TO: Frank and Dr. Euphronious digging up Ida’s body, formerly a gangster’s moll, from a potter’s field. She had been killed by henchmen of crime boss Lupino for speaking out about his malefactions.
Ida’s subsequent animation, in fact the entire narrative, is sustained by feminine energy. From Mary Shelley’s book to Gyllenhaal’s script, the main characters—Ida/The Bride/Mary Shelley (played by Irish actress Jessie Buckley), Dr. Cornelia Euphronious (Annette Bening), Detective Myrna Mallow (Penélope Cruz), crusty maid Greta (Jeannie Berlin)—all contribute.
Jessie Buckley in particular is riveting in all three of her roles and gives an Oscar-winning, nay, Oscarette-winning performance (who needs another male stiff to validate your rendition?).
Unlike the Monster, Ida/The Bride is not a mishmash of female body parts. She is her own woman, with her own body and agency, but suffers from amnesia upon her awakening (Frank lies to her that her name is Penny). But she is no yes-woman and does exercise her ability to say “nay,” or more poetically, “I would prefer not to.”
This iconic line comes from Herman Melville's famous 1853 short story "Bartleby, the Scrivener." Ida/The Bride clarifies the correct author during the breakfast scene where Dr. Euphronious and her maid Greta are debating whether it was penned by George Eliot or Nathaniel Hawthorne.
Authorship and voice are themes that permeate the film. As an artistic creator, Ms. Gyllenhaal is a student of classic cinema, literature, pop culture, and the issues du jour. Part of the enjoyment of watching the film (I have seen it three times and counting…) was recognizing the homages paid to authors and their art. Some associated with cinema include Ida Lupino, The Bride of Frankenstein (1935), Young Frankenstein (1974), Bonnie and Clyde (1967), and Top Hat (1935). And in terms of headlines making current social media streams, the bride even utters the words “Me too.”
The phantom Mary Shelley possesses Ida/The Bride’s character and often engages in rhythmic outbursts in a British accent, using the reanimated body as a vocal channel for her bridled aspirations.
However—Lo! This is not your great-great-great-grandma’s Mary Shelley (or even my English nana’s either) or her fictional characters. Ida/The Bride’s language pole-vaults the entire spectrum of language and posture—from the poetic to the profane (the film is rated R). In one carnal request the bride makes to Frank, even my toes curled!
Of course, a woman who speaks her mind, speaks truth to patriarchal power, and, as memories of her murder begin to flood back to her, increasingly vents her rage against those who abused her, she and Frank soon run afoul of both the law and the lawless. A classic cinematic showdown ensues.
© 2026
🥝🥝🥝🥝
